Marilyn Manson gets burned again

Christina Paz told police that Marilyn Manson and Nine Inch Nails’ music told her to burn her dad’s house. Should we buy it? Photo by Flickr user Pipistrula.

Here we go again.

Christina Paz, a 29-year-old El Paso resident, set fire to her father’s house two days after Christmas. Nobody was hurt in the blaze, though the home was seriously damaged. Paz told police that she set the fire because there were messages in Marilyn Manson and Nine Inch Nails’ music telling her to do it.

Those same bands, she said, also told her that:

“her mom and dad for trying to kill her on Christmas Day, that they had planned to sodomize her and chop her up with the help of a neighbor.”

These are some outrageous, likely psychotic, beliefs. And yet, they’re reported practically as fact by the El Paso Times reporter, alongside facts such as Paz grew up in the house, her father was in a nursing home, and her relationship with him was “complicated.”

Her arson method? She painted a bed with super glue, then struck a match. When police arrived, she was standing in the front yard, and turned herself in. She’s being held on bail.

Unfortunately, her arrest makes it less likely that she will be evaluated for the number of medical causes of psychosis, from brain tumors and infections to hormonal imbalances and some forms of epilepsy. This woman needs a competent doctor, not a prison sentence.

Meanwhile, we see two bands dragged through the mud, however falsely. For the record, neither band has songs that encourage people to set fires (or suggest that their families plan to victimize them in the way Paz believed). Manson was falsely implicated in the Columbine High School shootings, even though Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were not fans of the band. Erroneous reporting by overly eager reporters led to the idea that this music could incite violence, and the reputation has stuck, many debunkings later.

There has never been any proof that music alone can provoke violent behavior. The many, many court cases that have attempted to prove a link have been thrown out. And fans of music — loud, angry music especially — says the music soothes them, calms their more aggressive impulses. It doesn’t worsen them.

Who are you going to listen to: the one music fan who claims she heard hidden, arson-fueled messages in the music and acted upon them, or the millions of fans who didn’t?

Mentally ill killer may be released from German prison; what’s Satan got to do with it?

Daniel and Manuela Ruda, pictured during their 2001 trial. Daniel could soon be released from prison. Photo by ddp’s Kirsten Neumann.

A mentally disturbed man could soon be released from German prison after serving 15 years for the bloody slaying of a friend.

The London Evening Standard reported that Daniel Ruda, 35, will go before a parole board in Germany next week. There, he will find out whether he will be released early for good behavior.

Ruda and his wife, Manuela, were sentenced to prison in early 2002 for the murder of Frank Hackert. The newlyweds allegedly stabbed Hackert a number of times before drinking his blood. Reporters, then and now, latched onto the fact that the Rudas claimed they were vampires. Some, including the Evening Standard’s Allan Hall, have continued to call the couple “Satanic.”

Why?

Well, according to the Telegraph, “they said the devil told them to” kill their friend.

Daniel Ruda, a car parts salesman, and Manuela, had admitted the killing, but said they were not responsible because they were acting on the devil’s orders. “Kill, sacrifice, bring souls,” was how they described the command.

The couple said they had chosen “Hacki”, as they called him, for sacrifice because he was “so funny and would be the perfect court jester for Satan”.

Throughout the trial, the Rudas showed off, appearing in outlandish costumes, flashing their devil-horn signals and threatening witnesses.

In general, people who believe the Devil is telling them to kill someone qualify as psychotic — not Satanic. Fortunately, the judge in this case recognized that, and assigned Daniel and Manuela to different psychiatric units. Since then, Daniel has apparently become the librarian of a prison near Dortmund, Germany. That’s not enough information to tell whether his condition has stabilized. Manuela remains in prison for her participation in the crime.

Unfortunately, the Ruda’s flamboyant behavior during the trial made them poster children for the anti-Satanists, who like to hold up photos (particularly this one of Manuela) of them as proof that Satanism leads to violence and homicide.

Satanism, like just about every other faith, does not endorse, condone, or encourage harming others — let alone killing them. You can argue that if the Rudas didn’t want to be held up as such an example, they shouldn’t have behaved the way they did — either during their crime or during their trial. But how much impulse control and personal responsibility can we expect from two people who are so clearly mentally unbalanced? And what of the press’ responsibility to report in a fair and accurate manner?

Furthering the “Satanic” rallying cry, as the Evening Standard did, does nothing to clarify whether Daniel Ruda is back to good health and safe for release. It also confuses a potentially frightened public into believing that Satanism is to blame for what happened — and that young people who find a home in this particular faith are vulnerable to (or likely to) carry out the same kinds of crimes. This is unfair to Satanists, to the public, and to the parents of teens exploring such faiths.

Do you think Daniel Ruda should be released from jail? What kinds of treatment do you think he should have received during his imprisonment, if any?

In 2011, “psychotic” is still synonymous with “Satanic”

Is this graffiti Satanic? Photo by Flickr user stttijn.

Satanic \Sa*tan”ic\, Satanical \Sa*tan”ic*al\, a.
Of or pertaining to Satan; having the qualities of Satan; resembling Satan; extremely malicious or wicked; devilish; infernal. “Satanic strength.” “Satanic host.” –Milton. [1913 Webster]

If someone simply uses the word “devil,” is that Satanic? If someone thinks the devil emerges from his girlfriend when they fight, is that Satanic? If someone kills his girlfriend, then writes “The Devil inside” on the wall in her blood, is that Satanic? Nashville’s WSMV-TV thinks so. They say Maxmillian Ocon, suspected of murdering Rafaelia Ortiz, “wrote satanic [sic] messages on the wall.” That message turned out to be “The Devil inside.”

That phrase might call to mind an INXS hit or a horror-based video game. Instead, police say Ocon was referring to his belief that “the devil came out of his girlfriend when the two argued.”

Sure, by the first definition above, “of or pertaining to Satan,” the phrase “the Devil inside” is technically “Satanic.” If, indeed, it refers to the idea that Ocon thought his girlfriend was possessed, then it’s also psychotic. If the reporter had written, “A father accused of killing his girlfriend and writing psychotic messages on the wall in her blood was turned into police by his own son,” how does that change the message of the story? How does it change your perception of Ocon, or of the crime?

Maybe I’m just pedantic, but when I hear talk of “Satanic crime” or “Satanic messages,” I hear the implication that these crimes or messages came from someone who’s a Satanist. The problem with this is twofold. One, it connects Satanists with criminal activity, when in fact Satanists are fairly nonviolent people. Two, it implies that the actions of someone who has lost touch with reality — in the clinical sense — can be chalked up to evil incarnate. Nuh-uh. That isn’t how it works.

The idea that evil is somehow responsible for mental disturbances is a very old one, but it’s one we should have gotten past by now. In 2011, we know the markers of psychosis, if not the precise cause. We know for sure it isn’t caused by Satan. But calling Ocon’s alleged message “Satanic,” rather than “psychotic,” sets the clocks back hundreds, even thousands, of years on the public’s understanding of criminal (and mentally unbalanced) behavior.

In an era when we’re trying to make sense of violence — especially among teens — journalistic switcheroos like this one don’t help in the slightest. Sure, they sell newspapers — and lure us in to another story about the breadth of human nature. But they don’t get us closer to truth or understanding.

Parents, what do you think of when you hear the word “Satanic?” Have you ever come across anything in your child’s life that made you wonder if he or she was in danger of being exposed to evil? What was it, and how did you handle it?